They did this by not letting the public know their true intention.
Since at this moment science does not have all the answers to DNA, they insinuate that evolution is wrong and the answer should be some place else.
They explain their science from their point of view and do not share the arguments for evolution.
They explain how perfect and wonderful life is and that it could not come by chance.
Davison • Mind and Cosmos: Why the Materialist Neo-Darwinian Conception of Nature Is Almost Certainly False • Moody Institute of Science • Polonium halos • Providence Lost: A Critique of Darwinism • Rethinking Darwin: A Vedic Study of Darwinism and Intelligent Design • Seeking God in Science: An Atheist Defends Intelligent Design • Suboptimal design • The Darwin Myth: The Life and Lies of Charles Darwin • The End of Darwinism • The Mystery of Life's Origin: Reassessing Current Theories • The Origin of Human Nature: A Zen Buddhist Looks at Evolution • The Wonders of Creation Reveal God's Glory • Thomas Nagel • Academic Freedom Act • Edwards v.
Aguillard • Eugenie Scott • Indiana Senate Bill 89 • Kitzmiller v.
It looks into scientific theories "scientifically". It examines the heavy weight theory of origins, the chemical and biological theory of evolution, and asks the extremely difficult questions in order to reveal undirected natural process for what it is – a hindrance to true science. The code that's in every cell, every piece of DNA and all living things.
Even though we've made many breakthrough discoveries in science there's still so much more to be discovered.
As culture spread its influence across the land with monumental symbols of ownership, animals were tamed, seeds were sown, forests decimated and minerals excavated. How is wildlife adapting to this brave new world, who are the winners and losers, and what efforts are we making to help?Gish extensively discussed his belief that chemical evolution fails to address the question of abiogenesis and the origins of life.